January 14, 2020
46% | |||||
22% | |||||
16% | |||||
8% | |||||
4% | |||||
1% | |||||
1% | |||||
Total votes: 199 |
dec 6358 votes Joined: April 2008 |
    Tuesday 3:05 AM
I am the one who split the fives. That made more sense to me. Numbers and strategy bear that out. dec |
JQT 4143 votes Joined: October 2008 |
    Tuesday 3:39 AM
Even though we would ideally like to be at or beyond Hole 95 to begin as Dealer today, dealing from *just beyond* the final "corner" is not too terrible of a position.
Meanwhile, Pone is actually "upside down" here, since, in spite of the fact that he or she has reached precisely such a position, Pone is currently 'Pone' and therefore is NOT the Dealer! This could still spell trouble for us if we don't get our "act" (pegs) in gear, and so this is one of those times in which we might be glad to give up Six Holes in order to get just Two or Three Holes; that is, if we only do so ONCE! Our "Three Counts" should put us somewhere around Ninety-Three plus Twenty-Six or the vicinity of Hole 119, and thus this illustrates the nature of our Potential Real Estate Predicament (PREP) concerns today. But Pone has certainly 'got it worse' than we do today, as Ninety-Six plus Ten (the average for the Non Dealer) gets him or her to Hole 106, at which time we shall then 'steal back' First Hand Show as the Next Non Dealer. A 'balanced approach' here appears to be Keep (2 2 5 8) and Toss (5d 7d), with the promise of at least Nine Points. But even better, considering our dilemma today, might be Keep (2 2 7 8) and Toss (5 5), which while only promising at least Seven Holes, has several added benefits. Worse than either of these two choices I believe would be Toss (7 8), so we won't even consider this today. But let's now 'sidle up' to that splendid idea of Toss (5 5), which as we know tends to produce a Crib Value of around Nine Points *all by itself*! This, when added to our Pegging plus Hand, ought to meet the objectives we determined and specified earlier. I especially like the "Pegging Prospects" (good PP) of being the Dealer with that three-card "Magic Eleven" in the form of (2 2 7). This is likely to be our real "Goal-Getter" today. And so, it's Toss (5 5) to the rescue, with a Queen Cut that should help our Crib and hopefully NOT help our Opponent. We do have some "wiggle room" in the pegging, but we also must be careful not to 'wiggle too much' lest our Opponent shall 'snatch' Victory right out from under us: We got this 'thang' under control! |
scottcrib 1636 votes Joined: August 2019 |
    Tuesday 4:51 AM
This hand is from a grass roots game I was watching a couple of weeks ago. The dealer threw 5-7 suited. I would have thrown 5-5. The group was split between the two options. I have been burned by 5-5 before, but we must play the averages. scottcrib says: Nice to see a Q cut! |
Jazzselke 2586 votes Joined: March 2009 |
    Tuesday 5:15 AM
We hold no face cards, so hopefully at least one thrown by opponent. And maybe even K10 awaits us.Pegging needs to go our way as well. |
Rosemarie44 2052 votes Joined: March 2016 |
    Tuesday 5:25 AM
Putting a pair of 5's in our crib. Expected averages favor this selection. |
james500 3923 votes Joined: June 2013 |
    Tuesday 5:45 AM
I'm in the 5-5 group, but I'm interested to see how 5d-7d performs in Hal's analysis later. Might it surprise us? |
mfetchCT425 1399 votes Joined: February 2009 |
    Tuesday 6:01 AM
Sacrificed two points to toss the 5-5. It could give us the crib we need to get down the board. 2-2-7-8 has some potential to peg with the 3-card magic 11. |
jmath714 1299 votes Joined: January 2012 |
    Tuesday 6:13 AM
Has to be 5-5. Time to peg, hoping to get in our 2-2 for 4. |
horus93 1281 votes Joined: December 2017 |
    Tuesday 7:00 AM
At -3/+10 with good cards total offense to the cut |
cwed 1355 votes Joined: October 2014 |
    Tuesday 7:31 AM
Toss 5-5 is the only option for me. I'm holding a magic-11, so hopefully 31-for-4 is in my future. On the other hand, I'm willing to jump right into a pegging battle with 2-2 and 7-8 since a Queen cut is not of immediately help to the pone if she held low or middle cards. |
wasa 3018 votes Joined: November 2014 |
    Tuesday 7:51 AM
As scottcrib said, to me was between the 5-7 and the 5-5. Since 5-5 is our best toss, into my crib it goes. |
JCM 910 votes Joined: April 2019 |
    Tuesday 8:42 AM
Hmmm.
A. 2-2-7-8(5-5) = 4(hand) + 9(Av crib) = 13 + pegging. B. 2-2-5-8(5d-7d) = 6(hand) + 6(Av crib) = 12 + pegging Score is 93*-96. We want to reach about 111 or more this hand, since we have 1st count next hand, and we average 10 pts as pone. 18+ pts we need. Pegging should be a little better with (A). We have 2-2-7 working for us there. And it generates, on average, about 1 more pt than (B) So I go for (A). |
Gougie00 5730 votes Joined: March 2008 |
    Tuesday 8:44 AM
Nice puzzle. 55 or 57 to the crib? I chose 5-7, preferring to hold more points in the hand. |
JRCeagle78 1054 votes Joined: June 2016 |
    Tuesday 9:19 AM
I first have to decide which is more important at this stage of the game. Points in the hand or position after all is counted. The pegging value for both discards (5-5)(5d-7d)are fairly equal, but it is hard to dismiss the pegging value of the 3-card eleven(7-2-2). I chose the 5-5 discard because the final position possibility appears to be more in our favor. The Queen starter card will bear this out. During the play of the hand, the 2-2 may be the two most important cards of the hand. The whole play of this hand hinges NOT on our cards, but rather, the first play of the pone. Ras2829 says: Hi JRCeagle78: Based on my empirical data there is a huge difference between 5-5 and 5-7 discards. Here are the discard profiles to own crib for those: 5-5 8.876 (500) 1/91 scores two points 2.4%, 3-7 16.6%, tallies 8-11 60.2%, and scores 12 or more 20.8%; the 5-7 6.009 (703) 11/91 scores two points 7.681%, 3-7 63.302%, 8-11 25.604%, and reaches 12 or more 3.413%. Ras2829 says: Hi JRCeaghle78: The 5-5 and 5/7 look much differently. Here are the discarding profiles for each: 5/5 8.876 (500) 1/91, scores 2 points 2.4%, tallies 3-7 16.6%, scores 8-11 60.2%, and reaches 12 or more 20.8%. The 5/7 scores 2 points 7.681%, scores 3-7 63.302, tallies 8-11 25.604%, and reaches 12 or more 3.413%. Ras2829 says: Sorry friend - didn't intend to give you the double-barreled treatment. Can't fathom how this occurred as even the wording is different. |
dgergens 938 votes Joined: January 2018 |
    Tuesday 10:08 AM
Hedging my crib in case pone gives me some X's or some 7's or 8's. I don't think the pair of 5's is going to be THAT MUCH greater than one 5. dgergens says: OK, so RAS says it's nearly 3 points better. Will keep that in mind for future. |
joekayak 1873 votes Joined: May 2016 |
    Tuesday 10:45 AM
At 93, we need all we can get. 5-5 is such a powerful throw to ones own crib, can give up a sue 6 in hand plus 2 in crib for 4 in hand and hopefully 10 in crib. Opponent at 96 argues for OFF OFF OFF |
Ras2829 5154 votes Joined: November 2008 |
    Tuesday 11:47 AM
At hole 93 with opponent well beyond, it's off., off. off., play on the lead although would take 15-2 on 7/8 lead rather than pair. Will try to parlay the 2-2 back-to-back in end to pegging sequence. Might even pick off a lone deuce. Of course, as stated by others the magic eleven often works when playing the 7 on a X-point lead . The 7 response forces the five off the play and will often advance the count to 27 which is what we are seeking. You might like to see the discard profiles for 5-5 and 5-7 (only two options that I looked at) in my reply to JRCeagle78 above. Ras2829 says: BTW the sacrifice limits outlined in RAS' Big Hand Rule will make this and other similar decisions for you with ease. If you are not familiar with sacrifice limits and the discard combination to which they apply when dealing, email raswino29@outlook.com. |
Coeurdelion 5595 votes Joined: October 2007 |
    Tuesday 2:42 PM
I think it's between 2-2-7-8 (5-5) and 2-2-5-8 ((5D-7):
2-2-7-8: 4pts + 8¾pts (Schell: 8.79) = 12¾pts 2-2-5-8: 6pts + 6pts (Schell: 6.01) = 12pts Potential: 2-2-7-8: Improves with 22, 3333, 4444, 55, 6666, 777, 888, 9999 = 26 cuts = 26/46 = 56.5% up to 7/8/11pts with 22, 55, 6666, 777, 888, 9999 = 20 cuts. 2-2-5-8: Improves with 22, 3333, 55, 6666, 777, 888 + 16xXs = 34 cuts = 34/46 = 73.9% up to 12pts with 22, 55, 888 = 7 cuts. Position: We're 3pts short of position and Pone is already there. If they score the average 10pts They'll be in position to go out the following deal. I think we need to play Offense to go out as Pone next deal. Pegging: Both hands will peg well but 2-2-7-8 has a 3-card magic eleven so I think it will peg better. Summary: 2-2-7-8 has a starting value ¾pt more than 2-2-5-8 and has 20 cuts for 7-11pts compred to 7 cuts for 12pts. 2-2-5-8 has more cuts for improvement but I believe 2-2-7-8 will peg better. So I'll throw 5-5. |
HalscribCLX 5318 votes Joined: February 2008 |
    Tuesday 2:45 PM
At 93*-96 playing a Bold strategy for the pegging the dynamic expected averages and Win/Loss %s are:
_______________Our Offense___Hand_Pegs_Crib_Total____W1 %___W2 % 2-2-7-8___6.09+3.17+8.88=18.14____1.3____43.9 2-2-5S-8__8.09+3.54+6.03=17.66____1.4____37.0 Offense_______L1 %___L2 % 2-2-7-8_______0.4____28.8 2-2-5S-8______0.4____32.9 2-2-7-8 is better for expected averages by 0.48pt and is significantly better for Win %s and Loss %s. So I'll select 5-5 to discard. After the Q cut I'll play Offense to the lead. |
Andy (muesli64) 2223 votes Joined: August 2009 |
    Tuesday 3:44 PM
Hedged the bets. |
Goo 78 votes Joined: November 2019 |
    Tuesday 4:29 PM
|