July 12, 2019
40% | |||||
21% | |||||
11% | |||||
10% | |||||
6% | |||||
3% | |||||
1% | |||||
1% | |||||
1% | |||||
1% | |||||
0% | |||||
0% | |||||
Total votes: 189 |
dec 6357 votes Joined: April 2008 |
    Friday 3:09 AM
Giving up a five and a Jack (12-17plus crib) not on my list of options. However leading a five might be. dec |
Rosemarie44 2052 votes Joined: March 2016 |
    Friday 3:22 AM
What else would you retain and discard with today's hand? Start with 4 points and a chance for improvement to 12 points. |
wasa 3017 votes Joined: November 2014 |
    Friday 3:28 AM
Need to keep opponent's crib small. |
Carl Walters 254 votes Joined: June 2019 |
    Friday 3:35 AM
J-8 seems the best bet with only five points in it. Had hoped for a 6/X at the cut but the 9 wasn't too shabby. |
mrob2199 1434 votes Joined: February 2009 |
    Friday 3:43 AM
Obviously not thrilled with today’s cut-I wanted to go in with 6 instead of 4-in case of a cut that kills the hand -with dealer 36 out and me already holding a 7 I’m not overly concerned about my discard of the pair of eights-usually when I’m dealing with a hand like this I ask myself this question-am I more likely to deal myself short with my next deal by breaking it up too conservatively-or am I more likely to give up a huge crib by not playing maximum defense-in this particular hand I think it’s more likely to lose by playing too conservatively with this hold-thus my keep of the 5-5-7-J Guest says: I went with the crowd today, Superstar. I'm not brave enough to throw a pair of 8's, but thanks for letting us into your head. As long as you don't answer those questions in your head aloud. Then we'd have to call you "E" Junior :) mrob2199 says: Lol silly guest girl!-today’s puzzle is pretty tough-I can see the logic in keeping the 5578 too |
zeke76 1395 votes Joined: August 2018 |
    Friday 3:58 AM
Trying to balk the crib. |
JQT 4143 votes Joined: October 2008 |
    Friday 4:01 AM
If we can become Next Dealer at or beyond Hole 96, we are in excellent shape. That's only Six Holes away, which is below average, and yet we were dealt a nice arrangement today ... too nice, perhaps.
Still, I think we lose nothing by defending our good position today, and so I'll Toss (8 J) without hesitation. Throw Toss (5 J) or Toss (8 8) at your own risk! I may lead a 5 Card, just to 'rattle' my opponent. Rattle-Rattle-Rattle! Interesting Articles Regarding AI and Poker Yesterday: https://gizmodo.com/superhuman-ai-crushes-poker-pros-at-six-player-texas-1836257695 and back in Mid-June: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/robots-are-beating-humans-at-poker/ JQT says: In Cribbage, the time to play DEFENSE is when we are Pone. This is because we have TWO places in which to effect control over our Opponent: the DISCARD and the PEGGING. The time to play OFFENSE is when we are the Dealer, and have more control over our own movement, and less control over our Opponent. |
james500 3922 votes Joined: June 2013 |
    Friday 5:16 AM
I need six or more points in this hand to be in position in the next. J-5-5 guarantees me this.
The current dealer is 11 points off the pace, so I'm prepared to risk 8-8 in the full knowledge that the 7 in my hand deprives the crib of a useful card. Lead the red 5. |
Gougie00 5729 votes Joined: March 2008 |
    Friday 5:41 AM
A defensive hedge. I am likely to gain position so I will try to give the dealer nothing in the crib. Lead the 8 and ditch the 5s |
JCM 910 votes Joined: April 2019 |
    Friday 6:12 AM
The score is 90-85*. If 95 is our next target, we only need 5 points. Easy to achieve this with these cards - so defensive play is called for. Hence discard J-8(balking dealer's crib). Maybe even lead a 5. |
Jazzselke 2586 votes Joined: March 2009 |
    Friday 6:32 AM
Interesting day, most commenters other than Rob and James not willing to give up a pair of eights.My thought here is only an ace or four cut does not improve the hand. If there were more than 2 unhelpful cuts I would consider the eights. Or is this an example of Rob's thinking that separates him from the field? mrob2199 says: Dan sometimes people think I’m out of my mind!if you read a lot of the comments today you will notice many people mentioning getting to 95-and it’s almost as if that is their primary goal here-dealing out from 26 is 50-50 at best-you have to do everything you can to try to garner a few extra pegs here to swing that 50 to 65 or 70-with the dealer needing 36 with their 3 counts I’m very willing to risk throwing a dangerous pair to take those few extra pegs-just think for a sec-do you lose more games on 4th Street by dealing yourself bad or the opponent getting a 16 or 20 point crib? From my experience it’s dealing myself poorly Jazzselke says: Yep, I think it's a great instructional puzzle. Playing your own position first is a concept I think very easily overlooked. mrob2199 says: I believe there is a psychological element involved here as well-players are more content to lose with a bad hand(bad luck)than giving up a big crib to their opponent-which they can blame on their own bad decision Guest says: Just for the record, I would be trying for more than 95(or 96, whichever you consider the next target to be). Going beyond the target is always helpful. But that can easily be achieved with a defensive discard like J-8. So I still stick with that discard here, and then being aggressive on the pegging, such as leading a 5. - JCM |
horus93 1281 votes Joined: December 2017 |
    Friday 8:49 AM
This is an offensive position (+4/-11). We aren't defending anything. We're trying to avoid falling behind and keep up our momentum. The analogous endgame position would be 115-110*. Would you play defense there? It's very unlikely that even tossing 5-5 will give opponent enough points to catch up. It's much more likely that our cards falter and he wins that way.
Accordingly the only hands worth considering imo are 5-7-8-8 and 5-5-7-J. I like it this way better because it has more cuts for improvement. A bum cut will seriously hurt us and this keep has only 8 compared to 5-5-7-J's 12 (16 if you count the cuts for 7!). Though the averages are the same this hand has about an 83% shot of hitting 8 or more points. The other keep has only a 65% shot! horus93 says: And our goal isn't merely to make it to 96 as if dealing from there is a guaranteed win. We should be dealing as far beyond it as possible and with our opponent so far back we can afford to discard aggressively to make that happen. |
joekayak 1873 votes Joined: May 2016 |
    Friday 10:30 AM
Poker these days talks about blockers. My 7 is kin of a blocker to my two 8s that I elect to throw. I'm with Rob. Need to insure being at 96+ for next deal. With dealer at -10 and me holding one of the 7s, I'll go with 8-8 to the crib. |
Samgash 402 votes Joined: November 2016 |
    Friday 12:50 PM
Respectfully, I think we do need to have some defensive considerations here. 22-28 points combined from opponent hand, crib, and pegging is hardly unheard of. Unlikely, yes. But tossing J5 or 88 would leave some pretty bad max cribs on the table.
It’s tough because I’d normally be focused on getting as far past 96 as possible here. I think the balance of 5578 offers a good trade off. Only A, 4 offer insufficient points to get guaranteed position here. The 9 is next worst and places us at 97 minimum. Pegging looks not great, but lead the 8 methinks. Dump 5s at first opportunity. I could imagine even leading a 5, perhaps saving the 8 for later. That seems unnecessary though. So 8! |
JRCeagle78 1054 votes Joined: June 2016 |
    Friday 1:05 PM
I have watched baseball all of my life and one thing I can say is that you have a better chance in getting a "balk" than a grand slam. Toss the J-8. If I had a larger differential than five points the 8-8 would probably been my discard. It is my gut feeling that the pone is too close to try experimenting. I'll throw him off the track of reading my hand and lead the 5. |
Coeurdelion 5594 votes Joined: October 2007 |
    Friday 3:03 PM
I think its between 5-5-8-8 (7-J), 5-5-7-8 (8-J) or 5-7-8-8 (5-J):
5-5-8-8: 4pts - 3½pts (Schell: 3.53) = +½pt 5-5-7-8: 4pts - 3½pts (Schell: 3.52) = +½pt 5-7-8-8: 6pts - 7pts (Schell: 7.00) = -1pt Potential: 5-5-8-8: Improves with 2222, 55, 777, 88 + 15xXs = 26 cuts = 26/46 = 56.5% up to 8/10/12pts with all cuts. 5-5-7-8: Improves with 2222, 3333, 55, 6666, 777, 88, 9999 + 15xXs = 38 cuts = 38/46 = 82.6% up to 7/8/10/12pts with all cuts. 5-7-8-8: Improves with 2222, 3333, 55, 6666, 777, 88, 9999 + 15xXs = 38 cuts = 38/46 = 82.6% up to 10/12/14pts with 2222, 6666, 777, 88, 9999 = 17 cuts. Position: We only need 6pts to reach the 96pt positional hole whilst Dealer is 10pts short of position. So I'll play Defense for the pegging. Pegging: None of the hands are ideal for pegging Defense. Perhaps 5-5-8-8 is best. Summary: 5-5-8-8 and 5-5-7-8 both start with +½pt (1½pts more than 5-7-8-8) but 5-5-7-8 has more cuts for improvement to 7-12pts. So I'll throw a 8-J. |
Andy (muesli64) 2223 votes Joined: August 2009 |
    Friday 3:37 PM
yes |
HalscribCLX 5317 votes Joined: February 2008 |
    Friday 3:52 PM
At 90-86* playing a Defense strategy for the pegging the dynamic expected averages and Win/Loss %s are:
________________Dlr's Defense___Hand__Pegs____Crib___Total____W2 %____W3 % 5-5-7-8___7.65+(-3.39)+(-4.02)= 0.24___16.3____68.8 5-5-7-J___9.11+(-3.33)+(-5.73)= 0.05___23.3____71.2 5-5-8-8___6.70+(-3.50)+(-4.01)=(-0.81)__12.6____61.9 5-7-8-8___9.13+(-2.70)+(-7.72)=(-1.29)__24.6____69.7 Defense______L2 %____L3 % 5-5-7-8_______4.7____16.7 5-5-7-J_______9.4____15.9 5-5-8-8_______4.3____21.0 5-7-8-8______11.8____18.2 5-5-7-8 is best for expected averages by 0.21pt and although its not best for Win %s it is lowest for Loss %s. So I'll select an 8-J to discard. After the 9 cut I'll lead a 5 and play Offense: Lead___________Our Pegging Pts. 5____________________1.40 7____________________1.22 8____________________1.18 |
Ras2829 5153 votes Joined: November 2008 |
    Friday 10:32 PM
It's all been said - most eloquently by the way. Playing def., def., off. Am with HalscribCLX all the way this day and will lead the 5S and take pegs as offered. N/D has distinct positional advantage here needing to deal from 4th street CPZ (95-99). |